<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on Boundary Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosenblatt.org/blog/index.php/2009/12/04/update-on-boundary-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosenblatt.org/blog/2009/12/04/update-on-boundary-changes/</link>
	<description>Reflections and musings on education and other local issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:15:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://rosenblatt.org/blog/2009/12/04/update-on-boundary-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-7416</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosenblatt.org/blog/?p=125#comment-7416</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;m happy to.  The &quot;essential action&quot; part refers to the fact that there has been a significant imbalance in our four elementary schools for many years, and it has caused many problems, including long waiting lists at some of the schools, significant slack in others that create an overflow status and only one place for out-of-district students, and little predictability among parents as to what school their child may get in.  However, the boundary change is hardly an immediate panacea, which I guess is the answer to your second question.  Unlike a situation where one does a boundary change and moves the current students to a new school the following year, we are not moving any students.  Every student who attends one of our schools has the right to stay there until they graduate from that school.  Also, we continue to give preference to current students&#039; siblings.  So, as a practical matter these boundary changes affect future students who currently do not have an older sibling.  Therefore, it will take over five years for the changes to have a full effect.  In addition, for next year&#039;s incoming students, we also give them a first preference to attend their formerly zoned school.  So, all of these elements combined make for an extremely conservative and gradual implementation plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m happy to.  The &#8220;essential action&#8221; part refers to the fact that there has been a significant imbalance in our four elementary schools for many years, and it has caused many problems, including long waiting lists at some of the schools, significant slack in others that create an overflow status and only one place for out-of-district students, and little predictability among parents as to what school their child may get in.  However, the boundary change is hardly an immediate panacea, which I guess is the answer to your second question.  Unlike a situation where one does a boundary change and moves the current students to a new school the following year, we are not moving any students.  Every student who attends one of our schools has the right to stay there until they graduate from that school.  Also, we continue to give preference to current students&#8217; siblings.  So, as a practical matter these boundary changes affect future students who currently do not have an older sibling.  Therefore, it will take over five years for the changes to have a full effect.  In addition, for next year&#8217;s incoming students, we also give them a first preference to attend their formerly zoned school.  So, all of these elements combined make for an extremely conservative and gradual implementation plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Narayan</title>
		<link>http://rosenblatt.org/blog/2009/12/04/update-on-boundary-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-7415</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Narayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosenblatt.org/blog/?p=125#comment-7415</guid>
		<description>Hi Seth, 

Can you specify what the following comment means - 

This continues to be an essential action that we must take, and I’m excited it’s nearing its completion. If anything, I consider this to be a very conservative and gradual plan, as it doesn’t affect current students or their siblings, and still gives preferences to new students in affected areas to have first right to their “old” school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Seth, </p>
<p>Can you specify what the following comment means &#8211; </p>
<p>This continues to be an essential action that we must take, and I’m excited it’s nearing its completion. If anything, I consider this to be a very conservative and gradual plan, as it doesn’t affect current students or their siblings, and still gives preferences to new students in affected areas to have first right to their “old” school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://rosenblatt.org/blog/2009/12/04/update-on-boundary-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-7391</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosenblatt.org/blog/?p=125#comment-7391</guid>
		<description>School Board meetings are not videotaped, so the only record is the minutes taken.  The unapproved &lt;a href=&quot;https://sancarlos.csbaagendaonline.net/cgi-bin/WebObjects/sancarlos-eAgenda.woa/files/MTI2MDQ1NjM4NjkwMi9zYW5jYXJsb3NlQWdlbmRhLzEzNS8xMTkzL0ZpbGVz/unapproved_minutes_12.03.09.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;minutes for the December 3rd meeting are posted here&lt;/a&gt;.

However, very few concerns about the boundary changes were brought up the board meeting itself.  Most of the concerns were sent via e-mail or were presented at community meetings that Dr. Baker had prior to the meeting.  Most of those concerns were regarding some of the streets in the Devonshire Canyon area which people believed were walkable to Arundel and therefore would be more appropriate to stay in the school zone.  So, that is partly why the Superintendent proposed to delay the vote until January, take a tour of that area, and potentially re-look at the map.  I suspect that at tonight&#039;s meeting, Dr. Baker will proposed a revised map taking into those considerations...however, any proposal must still ensure that the numbers work out, and that it accomplishes the goal of better matching capacities of the schools with the student population in the various zones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>School Board meetings are not videotaped, so the only record is the minutes taken.  The unapproved <a href="https://sancarlos.csbaagendaonline.net/cgi-bin/WebObjects/sancarlos-eAgenda.woa/files/MTI2MDQ1NjM4NjkwMi9zYW5jYXJsb3NlQWdlbmRhLzEzNS8xMTkzL0ZpbGVz/unapproved_minutes_12.03.09.pdf" rel="nofollow">minutes for the December 3rd meeting are posted here</a>.</p>
<p>However, very few concerns about the boundary changes were brought up the board meeting itself.  Most of the concerns were sent via e-mail or were presented at community meetings that Dr. Baker had prior to the meeting.  Most of those concerns were regarding some of the streets in the Devonshire Canyon area which people believed were walkable to Arundel and therefore would be more appropriate to stay in the school zone.  So, that is partly why the Superintendent proposed to delay the vote until January, take a tour of that area, and potentially re-look at the map.  I suspect that at tonight&#8217;s meeting, Dr. Baker will proposed a revised map taking into those considerations&#8230;however, any proposal must still ensure that the numbers work out, and that it accomplishes the goal of better matching capacities of the schools with the student population in the various zones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Carlos</title>
		<link>http://rosenblatt.org/blog/2009/12/04/update-on-boundary-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-7390</link>
		<dc:creator>San Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosenblatt.org/blog/?p=125#comment-7390</guid>
		<description>Is the video posted of the Board meeting, I heard that there were several concerns raised on the proposed changes, but I haven&#039;t heard exactly what those are? Is there a link to the video or a summary posted somewhere?
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the video posted of the Board meeting, I heard that there were several concerns raised on the proposed changes, but I haven&#8217;t heard exactly what those are? Is there a link to the video or a summary posted somewhere?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.923 seconds -->

